Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
This is stupid. And there ain’t no cure!
I would not want to be marred by her anyway what a loser
Sara he said be judged by the greater judge of all mankind that would be God in layman’s terms are you able to comprehend that now?
Wow how impartial can you not be ????? Lord please help me understand
She looks retarded
Yes, actually there is a difference. Officiating marriages is not a part of her job. She can if she wants, but does not have too. Kim Davis HAS to issue marriage licenses to those who qualify.
Who would want her too. Why would you concider asking?
N
Where’s the outrage?
This was in 2012 when same sex marriage wasn’t allowed. This article reads like this was recent. While I don’t agree with same sex marriage, I also don’t agree with FB Pages re-hashing old news to fit there agenda. That’s not journalism and it’s wrong