Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
Lol the irony is thick in this one.
hope she is not beyound being arrested like other people
Lol this is getting out of hand just stop
Lib–$#%&!@*S.
oooh di tolak….ya sudah….
Lmao apples and oranges miss mature
She probably figures since shes a judge, black, female and awhole host of other things I could mention, that. she would get a p$#%&!@*. I can only hope they put her in the same cell as the clerk.Maybe they will do one another in. Pregidice on the bench or any where else should never be allowed
You are hardly an objective judge. Putting it mildly.
Oops. Jail time?
Supreme Court can’t make laws or Amendments to the Cons$#%&!@*ution. The people of Kentucky voted several years ago, and 70% said marriage is between a man and a woman. That then became an Ammendment to the Kentucky Cons$#%&!@*ution. The oath Kim Davis took was to uphold the Law of Kentucky, and she did. Sorry you clearly don’t understand how a Cons$#%&!@*utional Republic works.