Once again, the liberal media is proving that there’s no such thing as unbiased news reporting. In the wake of all the cases involving same-sex couples being turned down by county clerks and businesses, it would seem the tables have been drastically turned. This time it’s a gay judge refusing to perform straight weddings. And what are the legal repercussions for such an act? The answer is simple . . . nothing. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the government interference? It’s non-existent, because they’re pretending the problem doesn’t exist.
Read more on NEXT PAGE.
…while never turning couples away. She immediately directed people to other judges and upheld the law. Plus, judges aren’t required to do marriages. she objected without using her position to impose her views. So, definitely NOT the same as Kim.
Whatever…BS..
What?
Ugh
Why is this still on the bench?
Remove her from the bench then! She’s breaking the law
Throw Her In Jail Just Like They Did To The Kentucky Clerk
She set a good example of how to be against something and still do your job. Good for her.
Go to Jail then
Karma is coming to her