According to John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, global warming is about as true as Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi testimony.
In a series of tweets and emails he sent to Al Gore and various Democratic supporters and organizations, he called out climate alarmists with a barrage of facts based on actual science and not wishful thinking. As it turns out, if you chart global temperatures back into the ’70s, there are absolutely no signs of global warming.
Continue on page 2:
“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”
— Richard Lindzen
is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as well as the Distinguished Senior Fellow in the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Nuclear Energy Institute
Where did Al Gore get his degree in meteorology?
The Physicists versus the Climatologists follow the money
The physicists are right.
The fatal flaw in the climate models seems to come from one repeated assumption. The assumption is that positive feedbacks from greenhouse effects can exceed negative feedbacks. While this situation might actually exist over a given time period (and reflect temperature increases during that time period as a result) the average over the long term must net to zero. If it doesn’t, then everything we have learned about physics over the last 1000 years is wrong, and perpetual motion is possible. If a climatologist and a physicist were to discuss the matter, the conversation might be as follows:
Climatologist; I have a system of undetermined complexity and undetermined composition, floating and spinning in space. It has a few internal but steady state and minor energy sources. An external energy source radiates 1365 watts per meter squared at it on a constant basis. What will happen?
Physicist; The system will arrive at a steady state temperature which radiates heat to space that equals the total of the energy inputs. Complexity of the system being unknown, and the body spinning in space versus the radiated energy source, there will be cyclic variations in temperature, but the long term average will not change.
Climatologist; AHA! All that burning of fossil fuel is releasing energy that was stored millions of years ago, you cannot deny that this would increase temperature.
Physicist; Is it more than 0.01% of what the energy source shining on the planet is?
Climatologist; Uhm… no.
Physicist; rounding error. For the long term temperature of the planet… see above.
https://knowledgedrift.wordpress.com/climate-humour-page-the-climatologist-and-follow-the-money-series/the-physicist-and-the-climatologist-follow-the-money/
Global Warming as a Natural Response to Cloud Changes Associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)
I present new evidence that most of the warming could be the result of a natural cycle in cloud cover forced by a well-known mode of natural climate variability: the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). While the PDO is primarily a geographic rearrangement in atmospheric and oceanic circulation patterns in the North Pacific, it is well known that such regional changes can also influence weather patterns over much larger areas, for instance North America or the entire Northern Hemisphere (which is, by the way, the region over which the vast majority of global warming has occurred).
As Joe D’Aleo, Don Easterbrook, and others have pointed out for years, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) has experienced phase shifts that have coincidently been associated with the major periods of warming and cooling in the 20th Century. As can be seen in the following figure, the pre-1940 warming coincided with the positive phase of the PDO; then, a slight cooling until the late 1970s coincided with a negative phase of the PDO; and finally, the warming since the 1970s has once again coincided with the positive phase of the PDO.
— Dr. Roy Spencer, principal research scientist for the University of Alabama and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA’s Aqua satellite
http://www.drroyspencer.com/research-articles/global-warming-as-a-natural-response/
I think people like you are so sad….you ignore mountains of evidence and news about how manipulated data is to make global warming appear that it is happening, hockey sticks, emails and data breaches showing collusion and manipulation and NOAA being caught changing data to make warming appear to be true…….how fcking stupid are you? Oh wait….I bet you are a liberal moron. Never mind.
You are a sheep. I’m sure none of those scientists are deeply committed to liberal agenda?
Yes mike, when someone presents something that you’ve been taught not to agree with, attempt to nullify it by simply calling them a sheep. Such a cartoonishly simplistic response from a man who doesn’t know the first thing about what he’s talking about.
This isn’t my opinion, it simply something I accept because there was an enormous base of scientific evidence that supports it. You, however, I’m certain don’t base your opposition to global warming do two opposing scientific evidence, but because you have been instructed to by political pundits and radio talk show hosts, you know, the best and brightest minds this country has to offer! You are a joke, go somewhere else and waste someone else’s time.
I hope Facebook survives and you global warming idiots are still around in 30 years when they are warning about an ice age that will never happen……does no.one remember Gore stating that our coasts would be underwater by now? If you are complaining about global warming then stop driving, don’t use hair spray, do not BBQ, never buy food in a package…stop running your AC, use candles instead of lights…don’t ever use a cell phone…….oh wait….you just buy the BS like a bunch of lemmings but don’t actually do anything about it. Idiots….everyone of you.
Really ? It’s freezing cold in Iowa. And normal…….
The scientists are told what they can print and publicize. I have always found it interesting that they never mention that half the trees in the world have been cut down. I believe the politicians are working on personally investing the start up companies that they will need to correct the global warming while using taxpayer money to subsidize their growth.