The leftist media would have you believe that Donald Trump is too reactionary, too racist, and too xenophobic to be president. Unfortunately for liberals, history is at odds with their claims.
President Theodore Roosevelt, also a Republican, signed a bill that banned practicing Muslims from entering the United States after he won the election in 1904. He won that election with 336 electoral votes, 190 more than his challenger, Alton B. Parker.
Sure, times have changed in the past hundred years, but polling data suggests that Trump’s ban, even in its most controversial form, is supported by the majority of the United States. It’s another fact that the mainstream media conveniently forgets when attacking the President’s actions.
See details on Roosevelt’s implicit ban on the next page:
Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
It is illegal that Obama is bringing Syrian Muslim refugees here at all. !!————————————————–>>Islam non-immigration law——————————————>>4 oval office sitters have ignored this…..starting G.H.W.Bush( he started this with his ” 7 year free tax investment bill ” on gas station investments for foriegn Muslim investers .This was when the faces you used to see in Tampa totally changed to these guys ! 1990/1992 & then NAFTA -Clinton was worst ) to the present of course go figure that one..He is one of them ————>>>Islam non-immigration law
Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unlawful means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited
CHAPTER 2-QUALIFICATIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ALIENS; TRAVEL CONTROL OF CITIZENS AND ALIENS
212 GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY
(3) SECURITY AND RELATED GROUNDS.-
(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.
You can read it in it’s entirety at:
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
http://www.immigration-usa.com/ina_96_title_2.html
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT TITLE II
IMMIGRATION-USA.COM|BY WILLIAM C. BIRKETT
Obama’s lack of action to PROTECT AMERICA & AMERICANS FIRST is a complete dereliction to OATH & DUTY of AMERICA’S PRESIDENCY. Before he entered on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: — “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. ARTICLE II, SECTION 1, CLAUSE 8
Obama is committing TREASON against the Presidency, it’s people, our allies and our Constitution and NO POTUS is above the Supreme Law of the land aka our Constitution, PERIOD.I believe he should be held responsible for his actions even after he leaves office and PROSECUTED to the FULLEST for TREASON…
http://WWW.IMMIGRATION-USA.COM|BY WILLIAM C. BIRKETT
Barack Hussein Obama does not want you to know this SO…
**SHARE IT EVERYWHERE**
Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration :
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unlawful means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited …
You can read it in it’s entirety at:
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
http://www.immigration-usa.com/ina_96_title_2.html
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT TITLE II
(a) IN GENERAL.-Exclusive of aliens described in subsection (b), aliens born in a foreign state or dependent area who may be issued immigrant visas or who may otherwise acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence are limited to-
http://WWW.IMMIGRATION-USA.COM|BY WILLIAM C. BIRKETT
2 Post –#2 —>When Teddy Roosevelt Banned Muslims from America .
Though the law today is seldom enforced.
American concerns about the intersection of Muslim immigration and polygamy had predated Roosevelt, Taft and Wilson. The issue dated back even to the previous century. An 1897 edition of the Los Angeles Herald had wondered if Muslim polygamy existed in Los Angeles. “Certainly There is No Lack of Mohammedans Whose Religion Gives the Institution Its Full Sanction,” the paper had observed.
It noted that, “immigration officials are seriously considering whether believers in polygamy are legally admissible” and cited the cases of a number of Muslims where this very same issue had come up.
A New York Times story from 1897 records that, “the first-polygamists excluded under the existing immigration laws were six Mohammedans arrived on the steamship California.”
To their misfortune, the Mohammedans encountered not President Obama, but President Herman Stump of the immigration board of inquiry. Stump, an eccentric irascible figure, had known Lincoln assassin John Wilkes Booth and had been a wanted Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War.
In the twilight of his term, Stump had little patience and tolerance for either Islam or polygamy.
The Times story relates the laconic exchange between Stump and the Muslim migrants.
“You believe in the Koran?” asked President Stump.
“Thank Allah, yes,” responded the men in chorus.
“The Koran teaches polygamy?” continued the Inspector through an interpreter.
“Blessed be Allah, it does!”
“Then you believe in polygamy?” asked Captain George Ellis.
“We do. We do! Blessed be Allah, we do,” chorused the Arabs, salaaming toward the setting sun.
“That settles it,” said President Stump. “You won’t do.”
President Stump’s brand of common sense has become keenly lacking in America today.
None of the laws in question permanently settled the issue. The rise of Islamist infiltration brought with it a cleverer Taquiya. The charade that Muslims could believe one thing and do another was dishonest on the one hand and condescending on the other. It was a willful deception in which Muslims pretended that they were not serious about their religion and Americans believed them because the beliefs at stake appeared so absurd and uncivilized that they thought that no one could truly believe them.
Theodore Roosevelt knew better. But by then he was no longer in office.
Unlike today’s talk of a ban on Muslim migration from terror states, laws were not being made to target Muslims. Yet Muslims were the likeliest group of foreigners to be affected by them. Even a hundred years ago, Islam was proving to be fundamentally in conflict with American values. Then, as now, there were two options. The first was to pretend that there was no conflict. The second was to avert it with a ban.
A century ago and more, the nation had leaders who were not willing to dwell in the twilight of illusions, but who grappled with problems when they saw them. They saw civilization as fragile and vulnerable. They understood that the failure to address a conflict would mean a loss to the “enemies of civilization”.
Debates over polygamy may seem quaint today, but yet the subject was a revealing one. Islamic polygamy was one example of the slavery so ubiquitous in Islam. The enslavement of people is at the heart of Islam. As we have seen with ISIS, Islamic violence is driven by the base need to enslave and oppress. Polygamy, like honor killings and FGM, is an expression of that fundamental impulse within the private social context of the home, but as Theodore Roosevelt and others understood, it would not stay there. If we understand that, then we can understand why these debates were not quaint at all.
American leaders of a century past could not reconcile themselves to Islamic polygamy. Yet our modern leaders have reconciled themselves to the Islamic mass murder of Americans.
Thus it always is. When you close your eyes to one evil, you come to accept them all.
2 post #1.—>When Teddy Roosevelt Banned Muslims from America
Author: Daniel Greenfield Frontpage Mag
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
A hundred years ago, Muslims were furious over an immigration bill whose origins lay with advocacy by a headstrong and loudmouthed Republican in the White House.
The anti-immigration bill offended the Ottoman Empire, the rotting Caliphate of Islam soon to be defeated at the hands of America and the West, by banning the entry of “all polygamists, or persons who admit their belief in the practice of polygamy.”
This, as was pointed out at the time, would prohibit the entry of the “entire Mohammedan world” into the United States.
And indeed it would.
The battle had begun earlier when President Theodore Roosevelt had declared in his State of the Union address back in 1906 that Congress needed to have the power to “deal radically and efficiently with polygamy.” The Immigration Act of 1907, signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt, had banned “polygamists, or persons who admit their belief in the practice of polygamy.”
It was the last part that was most significant because it made clear what had only been implied.
The Immigration Act of 1891 had merely banned polygamists. The newest law banned anyone who believed in the practice of polygamy. That group included every faithful believing Muslim.
The Ottoman Empire’s representatives argued that their immigrants believed in the practice of polygamy, but wouldn’t actually take more than one wife. This argument echoes the current contention that Muslim immigrants may believe in a Jihad against non-Muslims without actually engaging in terrorism. That type of argument proved far less convincing to Americans than it does today.
These amazing facts, uncovered by @rushetteny reveal part of the long controversial history of battles over Islamic migration into America.
Muslim immigration was still slight at the time and bans on polygamy had not been created to deliberately target them, but the Muslim practice of an act repulsive to most Americans even back then pitted their cries of discrimination and victimhood against the values of the nation. The Immigration Act of 1907 had been meant to select only those immigrants who would make good Americans.
And Muslims would not.
In his 1905 State of the Union address, President Theodore Roosevelt had spoken of the need “to keep out all immigrants who will not make good American citizens.”
Unlike modern presidents, Roosevelt did not view Islam as a force for good. Instead he had described Muslims as “enemies of civilization”, writing that, “The civilization of Europe, America and Australia exists today at all only because of the victories of civilized man over the enemies of civilization”, praising Charles Martel and John Sobieski for throwing back the “Moslem conquerors” whose depredations had caused Christianity to have “practically vanished from the two continents.”
While today even mentioning “Radical Islam” occasions hysterical protests from the media, Theodore Roosevelt spoke and wrote casually of “the murderous outbreak of Moslem brutality” and, with a great deal of foresight offered a description of reform movements in Egypt that could have been just as well applied to the Arab Spring, describing the “mass of practically unchained bigoted Moslems to whom the movement meant driving out the foreigner, plundering and slaying the local Christian.”
In sharp contrast to Obama’s infamous Cairo speech, Roosevelt’s own speech in Cairo had denounced the murder of a Coptic Christian political leader by a Muslim and warned against such violent bigotry.
Muslims had protested outside his hotel, but Teddy hadn’t cared.
The effective implementation of the latest incarnation of the ban however had to wait a year for Roosevelt’s successor, President Taft. Early in his first term, the Ottoman Empire was already protesting because its Muslims had been banned from the country. One account claimed that 200 Muslims had been denied entry into the United States.
Despite these protests, Muslims continued to face deportations over polygamy charges even under President Woodrow Wilson. And polygamy, though not belief in it, remains a basis for deportation.
T. Roosevelt had it right on Muslim Immigration
Mediates and politicians have tried to label Donald Trump a bigoted, xenophobic racist since announcing in June he was running for president. At Trump Tower, the Republican front runner vowed to build a wall on the southern border and make Mexico pay for it. In December, shortly after the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif., Trump called for a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration to the United States.
The press, most of his chief rivals, and even the president predictably went bizerk. President Obama said it was “totally contrary to our values as Americans,” values which he insists are “universal.” But the data, as I’ve explained repeatedly here and here, shows the truth.
American values are not universal. In fact, before the American Left adopted the failed theory of multiculturalism out of the soon-to-be lost European nations, even their own progressive heroes understood the basic need to demand assimilation.
While “it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin,” as President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1907, “this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all.”
Teddy-Roosevelt-immigration-1907
And there you have it. Roosevelt, the progressive hero who broke up the big monopolies, was a closet xenophobe.
While his critique could apply to other demographic groups, the problem of Muslim assimilation is particularly difficult because Islam is neither only a religion and definitely is not a race. Islam is a political, judicial, civil and spiritual way of life that not only insists upon “divided allegiance” but also holds geo-political aspirations.
In a majority of Muslim-dominated Middle East countries, large pluralities–and, in many countries such as Afghanistan, Syria and Pakistan–majorities support making Sharia law the official law of the land. Worth noting, recent polls show 54% of Muslim Americans living right here is the U.S, right now, agree.
Now, as someone who has researched extensively and help define it, perhaps with and in more detail than any other before me, I can say with confidence that the American national identity is antithetical to the “values” forced upon subjects under Sharia, or Islamic law. They are not “universal values” and, subjugating the sovereign authority of the U.S. Constitution, at its core, violates a basic principle captured in Roosevelt’s words.
“We have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people,” the former president said in 1907.
That’s exactly the point, which everyone wants to avoid. The Constitution places national loyalty to and sovereignty with the American people, an idea that is completely foreign to practicers of Islam.
Obama also pointed out the “extraordinary contributions” Muslim Americans have made to the U.S., including those serving in the military. About those contributions, while I certainly applaud any American’s service, the overall numbers are actually quite concerning.
Military enlistment, as we study the political maturation of other migrant groups in the 19th and 20th century, can serve as a fairly good indicator of assimilation. There are few equal or greater acts to demonstrate patriotism than military service. Unfortunately, the numbers for Muslims indicate there is a major assimilation problem juxtaposed to other migrant groups. That is, if you agree with President Roosevelt and Mr. Benedict Anderson, the latter being the man who literally wrote the book on the very real concept of nation.
According to the Pentagon, there are roughly 5,896 Muslims serving on either active duty or guard in the U.S. military. We heard this number cited repeatedly following Trump’s proposal, including from an outraged former Marine-turned-talk show host Montel Williams. But that represents just 0.00027550809655493385 percent of the roughly 2.2 million Americans currently serving their country, and 0.32755555555555554 percent of their share of the U.S. population. That’s far below the proportional 18,000 that would put them in line proportionately with the enlistment rates for the rest of the country.
Going back to World War II, when Italian-Americans were targets of ethic discrimination and struggling to assimilate, more than 500,000 served on behalf of the U.S., making their enlistment and service rates the highest among any minority ethnic group. The roughly 0.8333333333333334 percent of the 6 million Italian Americans serving in the U.S. military is despite the fact that they were fighting on the opposite side as their home country.
For those who want to blame a non-existent, widespread anti-Muslim environment, I’d just point out that 200,000 Jews served in World War I at a time when anti-Semitic sentiment in America was far worse. In fact, according to the latest statistics from the FBI, there are still far more and worse crimes driven by anti-Semitic than anti.
Nevertheless, the bottom line is that politicians, pundits and just everyday Americans concerned about the future of our nation, should be able to point out these disturbing facts without being labeled xenophobic. A recent Pew Research study of demographic projections estimated that Muslims will make up 2.1% of the U.S. population by the year 2050, surpassing Americans who identify as Jewish on the basis of religion as the second-largest faith group in the country.
Considering the disturbing truth about Muslims’ views, which were revealed in a serious video produced by The Clarion Project in December, it’s not xenophobic to question the impact these demographic changes might have on American citizens. Public policy should hold the preservation of our values and our way of life above all, and the threat to that preservation would’ve concerned President Roosevelt just as much as it does Trump and his supporters.
Ron Stoner , Excellent post !! This is what all of us are fighting right here !!—————————————————————>Progressive & Fabian Socialist thinking
Proving just that, let me present you with a list of things I learned from my friends on the left.
Gender is an arbitrary societal construct, but Hillary must be elected because we need a female president.
Gay marriage and abortion are in the constitution, while the right to bear arms is not.
My opinion as a woman only matters if I’m a Democrat
A man can never understand a woman’s perspective on abortion, but he can become a woman.
If two people want to get married, it’s none of your business. However, if two consenting adults agree to a wage for services, it is your business how much said wage should be.
You’re too old and too white to run for office … unless you’re a Democrat.
Death penalty for babies is part of women’s rights. Death penalty for sadistic murders is abhorrent.
Global warming is “settled science,” but a fetus is not alive.
Tolerance is a one-way street with liberals deciding the direction.
Christians are out of line for saying homosexuality is a sin, but Muslims throwing homosexuals to their deaths off of buildings are just practicing their peaceful religion.
If you want it, you’re entitled to it.
If I am losing a debate strictly on facts, I can call my opponent a racist or a bigot and the debate is over because I win.
If Christians would just learn to coexist with the peaceful Muslims, they wouldn’t be beheaded… It’s the Christians’ fault because — Crusades!
Gay marriage will have zero impact on you … Now bake a gay wedding cake or qget sued for all you have worked for.
The Bible is completely irrelevant and absolutely false … until someone hurts their feelings. Then, God is love, and, “Judge Not.”
Science is king … except for that one lesson in biology regarding identifying sex as male or female. That’s not accurate at all.
Koch brothers = evil corporate interests; George Soros = benevolent donor.
The religion of preference is Islam. The favorite special interest group is the LGBT community… It does not matter that support of the first would result in the eradication of the other.
Gender is fluid; climate is not.
Life begins when they say, and chromosomes don’t matter.
Atheists, who claim God does not exist, believe He will be the end of civilization if we worship Him.
this man was a smart president
Ron Stoner , This is how it got started & when/who/how & who pays for it !!! ——All historical FACT !—————————————>Socialism’s plus & why & Federal Reserve to.
There is a info in here on the Federal Reserve & it covers Lincoln ! After you read this small but significant part of history , you mite see/understand a view point I came away with on his death !! Yes , John Wilkes Booth killed him , but you may see who finally paid for it !!! —————————>Socialism’s plus & why & Federal Reserve to.
$#%&!@*s right hand ,$#%&!@*Joseph Goebbels learned from Edward Louis , James Bernays & Walter Lippmann because they turned out the propaganda along with William Jennings Bryan on ” Progressive Socialism & Fabian Socialism with George Bernard Shaw….this man was the worst ever . George said about the young college students….” They are useful idiots to get Fabian / Progressive Socialism furthered by promising & never delivering the freebies “…..George also said this…..” If people say every 5 years are found out not to be producing for the many to feed off of then those people should be killed off as unproductive “….his words–1932 …& As Paul Harvey would say…..” Heres the Rest of The Story “—–who/when/how/who pays————–Thought you may like this , it will show when this started….William Jennings Bryan(envious /jealous /no business sense ) from Nebraska was one of if not the first Socialist in late 1880’s who said ” no man can make a $1 mil by himself “..referring to J.D. Rockefeller oilman ….info starts below:….
They(students ) do not know the true meaning /definition of Socialism…third word of Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Russian Communism) how did that turn out. The Swiss set Vladimir Lenin free from jail & $10 mil went with him to over throw Czar Nicholas Romanov ……….. These students today think socialism is fixing roads & feeding people or building infrastructure for the social mass’s . This is what ” Progressive Socialism ” teach’s these students thanks to teachers/professors who followed the Pres.Woodrow Wilson/William Jennings Bryan’s( he destroyed the size of our Military that T.R. Roosevelt built once he got into DC with Wilson ) doctrine at their ” Educational Summit on Progressive Socialism ” in 1915/17 time frame forward to today . ” Teach the students to think as far differently from their parents/grandparents way of thinking of capitalism/true democracy ” if you want Progressive Socialism to go forward from this time (to now ) & to get them to depend on the Govmt. System more…..not total yet , but getting close . It is a stopping time Now!!!!!
……………………………………………….. so by the time the 1920’s(the Roaring 20’s ) came this kind of thinking went to the side until the Great Depression & of course Franklin D. Roosevelt & his new deals ect by the time we won WW ll , this other so-called Socialist came along Robert Mantoon Thomas & said this….” Now that the Democratic Party has accepted ” SOCIALISM ” under the guise of ” Liberalism” I/He will not ever have to run for the office of President again on the American Socialist Party platform….Then this got passed down to socialist infiltrators of the Communist Party started really hammering the colleges & the weak mined & then came the 1960’s Saul Alinsky , Francis Fox Privin, Bernadeen Dorn & Bill Ayers ect…………………………………….Today this is why you have all this type of thinking /disrespect ect….All of this can be verified by you using these names & looking them up for yourself….Oh one more type of Socialist…”Fabian Socialist ” or ” Fabian Socialism.”…big believer in that & pushed it in colleges …George Bernard Shaw….it will surprise you of the “who’s ” that are in this movement.& this type feels at any age once your not producing your worth to support the others you should be eliminated , Fact !!..One other point about Pres. Woodrow Wilson , he is responsible for our ” Federal Reserve today..why ?…Because when he started his campaign he had ” no money ” & the Bankers(Rothschild) who started the Fed wanted it to be ” part of the U.S. Govmt.” so they told Wilson that they would give him the money for his campaign without a pay back ” if he would Institutionalize the Federal Reserve into Govmt. Bank ” & we are screwed till this day with 35% interest rate on Govmt. loans. This why Pres. Lincoln told these Bankers(Rothschild) to forget about 35% interest & Lincoln started printing Govmt. script/money himself to run the Civil War conflict……..Hope this helps you out & have a safe nice new year…Gene……… ……….who pays is right here……………….In the field of politics Evelyn’s main agents (including Soros), Norman Lamont, Peter Mandelson, Oliver Letwin and Vernon Jordan (all of whom are Khazars!). Lamont influence the Conservative Party and the potential prime minister Michael Howard (a Khazar). He was finance minister during the tenure of Margaret Thatcher. Participated in regional conferences together with Stjepan Mesic and Boris Tadic. Peter Mandelson is the current Minister of Great Britain in the EU and is close to Labour Party and Tony Blair.
On the other hand, Vernon Jordan (Lazard Bank) is very influential in the Democratic Party in the United States(he was an advisor to Bill Clinton and led the campaign for John Kerry 2004.). Evelyn’s wife Lynn financed Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign and is also a close friend of Hillary Clinton. How Clinton removes his opponents ………………….This above ^ here can be vetted by this title….” Rothschild over the Balkans “…George Soros gave $1 mil to John Kasich to stay in the race to screw votes up for Trump..!!!!….Another common core/NAFTA/Bailout r.i.n.o. bought & paid for !!!!!!……….Ted Cruz’s wife Heidi works for Goldman Sachs & the WB / IMF & Both are open borders like U.N. & Rupert Murdoch & are all owned by the ” Rothschild Group “…This Family is generational thru history…You look these people up & you’ll have a better understanding of WW ll & a certain European dicator of why he did what he did(no i’m not a fan of his either , but it is clear though !)…….This is all fact !!
Whoo Haaa, Tell it like it is Brother… Wake up and weep Liberals!!!!
Ron Stoner , This Family ” Rothchilds ” is generational in history & started the first baks in Europe at the era of the Vikings !! Has paid for more over throws & chaos than you can think of & came here -U.S. c/ Hamilton/Hancock !!!!!———–” Rothchilds over the Balkans ” look it up & you’ll learn more than you want & understand all of it !!———————————>Soros & Economy destroyers
György Schwartz (Kahazars Jew , Balkans / Russia , not Israeli) a.k.a George Soros , not Greek either ! Let’s not leave out his lil’ buddies —-Rothschild Group ….Hateful & socialist controllers everywhere !!!! ……….who pays is right here……………….In the field of politics Evelyn’s main agents (including Soros), Norman Lamont, Peter Mandelson, Oliver Letwin and Vernon Jordan (all of whom are Khazars!). Lamont influence the Conservative Party and the potential prime minister Michael Howard (a Khazar). He was finance minister during the tenure of Margaret Thatcher. Participated in regional conferences together with Stjepan Mesic and Boris Tadic. Peter Mandelson is the current Minister of Great Britain in the EU and is close to Labour Party and Tony Blair.
On the other hand, Vernon Jordan (Lazard Bank) is very influential in the Democratic Party in the United States(he was an advisor to Bill Clinton and led the campaign for John Kerry 2004.). Evelyn’s wife Lynn financed Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign and is also a close friend of Hillary Clinton. How Clinton removes his opponents ………………….This above ^ here can be vetted by this title….” Rothschild over the Balkans “…George Soros gave $1 mil to John Kasich to stay in the race to screw votes up for Trump..!!!!….Another common core/NAFTA/Bailout r.i.n.o. bought & paid for !!!!!!……….Ted Cruz’s wife Heidi works for Goldman Sachs & the WB / IMF & Both are open borders like U.N. & Rupert Murdoch & are all owned by the ” Rothschild Group “……This is all fact !!
it is a real Machiavellian Group c/ Friedrich Nietzsche thrown in !!! None of it good at all !!————>>The Rockefellers and Rothschilds will not Permit Cruz or Trump to Win !!
—————————————————————————– 1. Lord Jacob de Rothschild
2. Nathaniel Rothschild -son of Jacob
3. Baron John de Rothschild
4. Sir Evelyn de Rothschild
5. David Rockefeller
6. Nathan Warburg
7. Henry Kissinger
8. George Soros -György Schwartz
9. Paul Volcker
10. Larry Summers
11. Lloyd Blankfein
12.Ben Bernanke/Shalom
Rothschild plus / Destroyers of world economies
n