Barack Obama, through feigned tears and a glint in his eye, struck a major blow against your Second Amendment rights this week, and did so with no input from Congress whatsoever.
Obama’s latest illegal executive order attempts to make it look as if the president is doing something to combat the recent, very public mass shootings around America this year, but does nothing but push forward an agenda that not only ignores the root of the problem, but restricts gun rights in the process.
While the executive order focuses a lot on the “gun show loophole” that Obama claims is a huge contributor to gun violence in the United States, the fact remains that less than three-quarters of one percent of criminals are using guns purchased at gun shows. Still, Obama is pushing the false narrative that criminals are using those loopholes to purchase guns when they otherwise cannot.
Breitbart has compiled a list of facts that further undermines Obamas actions on guns. Read them on next page:
Guns is one thing and electronics is another. Key word, think it will. I just gave you proof it wouldn’t. Liberals are clueless.
Chris Covert Sorry, the only proof you have offered is your complete indoctrination. For all your apparent knowledge on smart gun techology, I’ll stick with the engineers at the major gun manufacturers. The iP1 (from a small manufacturing coming)has been on the market for about a year now. It has short comings, but nothing as you described, although several shell sites owned or influenced by the NRA have been critical of it. Besides, the issue has absolutely nothing to do with the viability of the existing technology. As I stated, Colt and S&W wanted to pursue the development of smart guns, but NRA inspired boycotts deeply affected their sales. All I did was point out that the private sector was very interested, disproving “Truth’s” claim to the contrary. “Truth” often has trouble with the truth. Another thing, why does it require being a liberal to desire safer guns? Another indication of your indoctrination.
Excuse my rush to hit send. That was company, not coming.
Indoctrination? Safer, I am an electronics engineer, dumbass!
So I am an electronics engineer. Breaking is more than a short coming. The criminal’s guns won’t have these. But they will have the jming technology to disable them. So you think those engineers are smarter than everyone else? You are not too bright, are you. Just another sheeple. Indoctrinated? Get off the crack! Point is the technics is a waste until you punish criminals. Did we have these issues 30 years ago? You are a true simpleton.
Pigs.
Chris Covert It is sad that you are still unable to understand the essence of my comment. “Truth” was not telling the truth about private sector interest in developing smart gun technology. As far a solution to gun violence, I have to admit, I don’t know. I do think that there are many avenues that should be explored. Now that you have announced that smart gun technology is not worth the effort to explore, maybe the manufacturers can concentrate on other areas of research. The manufacturers should actually reward you in someway, because of all the money they will save by firing their dumbass engineers who had led them to believe that the technology will work. One other thing, if you really want to have any credibility, at all, you really should discontinue the ad hominen arguments that have no basis in fact. You don’t know me, you don’t know my politics, you have no clue a to my degree of intelligence. However, you have given several clues as to your characteristics.
F em
Not advertising for Fox just like the comment
When I eat collards i$#%&!@*green