With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Bull s**t
Nancy doesn’t want her picture taken because she’s drunk most of the time.
Another liberal judge heard from
There had always been laws governor in recording and federal laws also , you do not have a right go record someone with their permission, time the shot stopped, I for one will ask 1 time to hand it over so I can delete if you attempt to run , refuse, act a fool I will shot u for being a theart
Means nothing!
MENTALLY DISTURBED DO NOT BELONG IN WASHINGTON PELOSI!!!
F U BITCH
Ridiculous
The American Bar Association is corrupted to its core.
Would someone please explain to me how the show cops aired all those years!?!? Ohh wait, the cops had authority over what they released and didn’t release.!!! Always against its public, this government has become tyrannical and treasonous!!!