With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
We fixxing to show you mfs more then a camera. Dumb wothless leaches
Someone afraid that the Truth might get out after the Lieing is done ?
Another one on crack!
B******t
B******T on that
We won’t let liberals rule. Be sure to vote against them.
film any way they work for us and paid by tax payers$#%&!@*rhem
What the?
Try and stop me scumbags
They can suck on the snotty end! What makes them any friggen different than you or me? What puts them above us? A badge or an office. Both are there to serve us. So if either are not doing for us, we have a right to see that.