With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Then they have no right to film us, that means no dash cams and no body cams.
BS!!
America ruled those courts are racist, and they will have to ban cameras in this country, but this government is about to fail badly, well most of it anyway, and they dont have a clue.
And the Citizens RULE that no court has the right to tell them who they can, and cannot film.
We have just as much right as they do !
BULL S**T
My Phone, I’m going to film who ever I want too!!!
We do have that wright, and besides you need to be kept in check none of us trust you pelosi and we want you gone
Democrats are destroying our Constitution. It’s time to DUMP THE DEMOCRATS!
Try and stop me