With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
NAZI Dictatorship
Bryce Tarpley moron, then your hat bad apple asscunt !!!
B******t, you make your stupid rules, I’ll video who I want.
What federal court? The 9th district?
Don’t work that way with government sadly to say !!
F*****K ..YOU
The judge must have been paid off by the dems
When are we going to see Nancy’s car accident where she was drunk and on Cocaine???? She is being protrected.
so does that mean that all public mounted traffic and security cameras are also illegal?
Does any of you judges remember youth oath of office. And the constitution that is our foundation. Maybe you might read it again we have rights. Judges don’t make LAW Congress does and j don’t remember that one