With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Watch me
Not on my watch!! This is insane!!
F**k that. Do it anyway.
It won’t be with people like you moran
I beg your pardon…..
Up yours !!
You cain’t stop it !!!!!
Only the GUILTY do not want to be photographed. The real idiots don’t want to be have their actions recorded and brought to court for their hearing.
here we go.
Why not are they doing something illegal
Why not unless you’re doing something that would incriminate yourself!!!!!