With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
It will get appealed
Democrats call Trump and Republicans Nazis. But it is They who use Gestapo tactics to Impose their agenda.
So shoot them instead.
We get filled all the time under “implied consent.”
Somehow it “malfunctions” if they might’ve done something wrong…
So we then need to presume they are armed specifically to injure us…
That makes any action against an enforcer self defense….
Wrong we do have the right.
BS
Wanna bet, you can’t take away everyone’s phone or cameras!
Csn not beat STUPID
F**e news folks
TOO BAD NANCY THAT MEANS WE HAVE PROOF!
Oh yes we do!