With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
More b******t. What are you afraid of hmmm.
You’ll Play Hell making that work.
The only reason to make this rule is to hide something. If everything was honest and above board it wouldnt hurt anything.
Watch me you fuckin fucks
because too much truth is getting out lol !
This is what they do in California
We have the power will tell you how it works now go do your job pass some Bills. get us the healthcare we need. Yeah and put that money back in the drawer you just took.
Idiot
Guess again liberal law breaking judges
This is BS they need the cameras on both sides sometimes because of the lies.