With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
B******t
Lois, I swear I have to go and proof read everything I post and if I get In a hurry and forget you can be sure it will be the most screwed up post I have ever posted, and some of the eordsx come out like a 1st grader spelled them.lol
politicians don’t want to be held to their words spoken and promises made to the electorate. you can promise anything to get elected.
They can try to stop us!
That is a crock.
Democrats ….nothing but laughable slave overseers for Obama and his plantation master SOROS
Federal court can kiss my$#%&!@*! I have the right to point my camera and or use my audio recorder , any damn where I want ! So let’s make this , politicians do not have the right to show their ugly disgusting thieving asses in public ! Problem solved !
Bull
Communist socialist party controls Must die.
I will do what I wish , when I wish , where I wish , and they can kiss my$#%&!@*!