With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Cause they get caught up in all their lies! Free speech! Judge can go to hell must be corrupt judge!
America was gone decades ago.
BS & we will video
Says who .
In “Public” you have no right to privacy.. Isn’t that what they claim?
FINE! We’ll just have that civil war then and rid ourselves of ALL tyrants.
Yeah. Good luck with that. Let me guess……another Obama appointee???
B******t…
B******t
These woman is nuts!