With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
stop being such big liars and you wouldn’t have to worry about being recorded
Good luck enforcing that one
The judge should know better, but money can turn people into morons like this judge…
Liberals afraid of something
They don’t want us to see how corrupt and stupid they are.
Wrong answer there court amen
Ha Ha!
Do what ever we want, we have freedoms
Nuts
Wtf?