With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
I’ll just leave this hear Nancy.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/727495700731374?view=permalink&id=952217258259216
No logic
More F**e lying news.
bull$#%&!@*SCOTUS said it was legal as they are in the oublic
HAHA especially when you are Pelosi and you have episodes of Alzheimer every 5 Seconds looking lost and out of words
If true, I need a picture of the socialist judge so I’ll know who to laugh at when I see him/her/it out in public!
That is bull…
Wrong!
As long as these public officials are paid with the peoples tax dollars we will video anytime we please.
The biggest problem with this nation are too many commie judges
Where do you have evidence that Trump wants to shut down the 1st Amendment?