With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
Nit acceptable and this is America. When will these activists be removed permanently?
sounds to me these “judges” just make it up as they go along
I will do it anyway!
Bull C**p. Another incorrect decision made.
That won’t stand once it gets to a real judge.
FEDERAL JUDGES ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO MAKE LAW. THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW. SO GO AHEAD CITIZEN, ALSO FILE WITH SUPREME COURT TO STOP THIS WICKED JUDGE.
That will go all the way to SCOTUS
Were they vote in.Then they have the right to this is America.they need to be held accountable for their actions.
Baloney
b******t