With the advent of cellphones as a standard device carried by hundreds of millions daily, the ability of citizens to film police and politicians in public settings has increased accountability for those holding positions of public trust.
Unfortunately, a growing trend of judicial tyranny could curtail a person’s right to access their phone to suddenly film an event unfolding before them in a public setting.
First Amendment rights advocates argue that the right to film public events should never be abrogated, given the protections of the U.S. Constitution.
But with the judiciary having more statist judges in place, it’s become more challenging to protect these most basic rights.
In the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Missouri, a recent ruling has struck down the right to film public officials in a public setting. On the next page, learn how the dispute may have to head to the Supreme Court to get resolved.
She’s a BC appointee…. Let me go to my toybox and get my suprised face on…
Lies
I’ll film anyone I please!
Bull
Is it me or is spell check and predictive text messing up about everything I type, I can tell by other post that I know that many people in America can spell better than this.
That is their plan. Fascist state.
F**k him.. I can and will if I want..
B******t
I wish Pelosi and Maxine Waters would stop taking selfies of themselves
B******t !!