Today the FBI finally announced whether or not Hillary Clinton would be indicted for her use of a private email server as secretary of state.
In the announcement, FBI Director James Comey claimed that Hillary had been “extremely careless” with intelligence that was “marked classified” at the time. He confirmed that over a hundred emails contained confidential information, with many receiving the “top secret” designation left only for the nation’s most vital secrets. He even confirmed that Hillary had failed to turn over hundreds of emails to the FBI.
In a roundabout way, he also made clear that Hillary had lied all along about how her email service was run, and what it contained.
You’d be forgiven if this sounds to you like someone who is about to be charged with a crime — but you would be wrong. Despite the mountains of evidence against Mrs. Clinton, she was not recommended for charges.
Why? Because there was no evidence of “intentional misconduct.”
Since when does intention lift you above the law? It’s clear Hillary had not acted within the boundaries of the law, yet she’s escaping charges, not because of a lack of evidence, but because her position as Democrat nominee has put her above prosecution.
See the report — and reactions — on the next page:
So, it’s OK to break the law now…
it because hilary is black mailing the director that why he did not indcite her
FBI AGENTS SOLD THEIR SOLE’S, FOE A CROOK LIKE HILLERY CLINTON. YOU ALL WILL HAVE A GOOD TIMEN IN HELL,
What judge in this nation has the balls to take her down?
Her husband as a leader in the White House could suck$#%&!@*anytime he wanted,she could give Russia secrets anytime she wanted who cares not theFBI she is fucking all of them
She, that is hillery has bought and paid for the czar of fbi . Now he is her lackey and does as she says or have her money forewarded to some other pimp
Bought and paid for
So the FBI is saying if we break the law and tell them we didn’t mean it ,we can go free?
and I always thought the FBI worked “for the people of the USA”
Can it be any clearer?
Federal Law: Title 18. Section 2071
Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Such as, say, President of the United States.
“If you do this or that bad thing, you’ve essentially disqualified yourself as being the leader of the free world,” said Mukasey, referring to the illegal server and the illegal handling of classified materials.
Mukasey specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.
For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:
“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”
Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
Shouldn’t voters know that? The media won’t tell them. So it’s up to us. Can you help hold Hillary accountable?
FBI Director James Comey’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unsecured email server does not mark the first time that he has investigated the presidential candidate for alleged wrongdoing.
Time reports that 20 years ago, Comey was a deputy special counsel on the Senate Whitewater Committee, looking into the conduct of then President Bill Clinton and the first lady. The inquiry focused on whether Bill had used his political position as governor of Arkansas in the 1980s to push through an illegal loan to benefit the couple’s business partner in the Whitewater [real estate] Development Corporation.
Several people involved with the Whitewater corporation (including Clinton’s successor as governor) ultimately went to jail, but the Clintons never faced criminal prosecution. The issue of their involvement none-the-less lingered as Bill Clinton ran and was elected president.
Hillary Clinton Was “cleaned and sanitized” to run for president, making her one of the most corrupt politicians to run for office in recent memory. She has repeatedly broken laws and continues to act like she did nothing wrong. She used illegally an unsecured home server, insisted that she had no classified information on her email, yet over 2,000 of her emails have been labeled as “classified,” with at least 20 being too sensitive to be released to the public by the FBI, the very same agency who just “cleaned and sanitized” her to run for president.
Yet
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/29/navy-engineer-sentenced-for-mishandling-classified-material/30862027/
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/6-brave-govt-whistleblowers-charged-under-espionage-act-obamas-administration
—- The Conclusion —-
Most Americans live in their myths, and these myths are immune to facts. While others become angry when confronted with information inconsistent with their preconceptions equals maintenance of the status quo.
The Constitution law forbids judges or lawmakers from infringing or passing legislation “editing” any amendment outside a constitutional convention. That amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
The defense of the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. (See The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946).
In the final analysis we find the hard truth…..We The People, find you willingly violated the law and failed to do your duty; you are hereby charged with Dereliction of Duty and Treason…
-For direct violation of the Kellogg–Briand Pact (or General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy) and United Nations Treaty where all members are bound by its articles.
-For failure to Uphold and Defend the Constitution here at home and unconstitutionally expanding empire, protecting corporate and banker interests and exporting democracy.
Where were you? Oh, I forgot, you failed your oath of office by expanding the empire, illegal wars, protecting corporate, military and banker interests.
I pray to the Creator that you have the strength to hear and face the truth and rethink your time served in the dark.