Hillary Clinton’s web of lies just got a little deeper.
This week, Clinton tried to blame former Secretary of State Colin Powell for her illegal behavior, suggesting that he was the one who initially suggested she use a private email address to conduct state business. Powell quickly disputed the allegation, claiming that “her people are trying to pin it on me.”
So why is Hillary Clinton back on defense in the first place? Likely because she knows that the full extent of the FBI investigation has yet to become public.
Many in congress are trying to release the full testimony before the general election in November, but right now all we have is a slow trickle of information coming from Washington D.C.
Still, that might be enough to cripple Clinton’s already weak campaign. Just this week, a new report is already threatening to discredit one of Clinton’s central claims surrounding her email server.
See the bombshell report on the next page:
What a lying piece of s…
LOL the FBI found stuff but won’t do a damn thing about it.
And.? Its ok
“Fraud alert!!Donald Trump Jacked Up His Campaign’s Trump Tower Rent Once Somebody Else Was Paying It
So is anything going to happen ?
No kilarey would not do that Pmsl
Burn that$#%&!@*to the steak. murderest trash.
The Clinton Foundation
The Clinton Foundation functions in such a way that it is funded by the people, governments, and companies that help create and propitiate the same problems the charity ostensibly seeks to address.
Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband are well known to be virtually in the pocket of the corporate America and large foreign donors. The Clintons have effectively established themselves as middlemen between the richest people on the planet and the U.S. government, abusing their positions in power also for personal enrichment. Basically, that has become their primary qualification that had assured the political career for Hillary Clinton for many years.
Hillary Clinton was rather poorly qualified as Senator: not a single bill of hers had really any supporters and none of the bills she had initiated was voted into law. As Secretary of State, she had no considerable achievements (just compare her to John Kerry). Instead, she is going to be remembered for Benghazi, the extracurricular activities involving embassy and security personnel, and her deleted emails… However, Hillary Clinton does not seem to care too much about any of those issues and her political career does not seem to have suffered because of her shortcomings as a state official.
One of the striking features of her career is that Hillary Clinton seems to have always felt protected and quite sure about her political future, no matter what. Another prominent element of her professional career is Hillary Clinton’s involvement with the Clinton’s family charitable foundation. All her genuine efforts seem to have been dedicated exclusively to shadowy activities around the Clinton Foundation.
The Clinton Foundation donor list has become what the Wall Street Journal called “a who’s who of some of the world’s wealthiest people.” Among them are many private corporations—including healthcare, oil and gas, and media giants—and foreign governments.
The Clinton Foundation has always been criticized for a lack of transparency. It raises a lot of questions about the Clintons’ personal and philanthropic dealings, along with questions about whether their private business interests have colored her exercise of public authority. Can it really be that the Clintons didn’t recognize the questions that all those transactions would raise? What does that say about their sense of the appropriate relationship between private gain and public good?
Under federal law, foreign governments seeking State Department clearance are barred from making campaign contributions. There is a legal prohibition aimed at preventing foreign interests from using cash to influence national security policy. Hillary Clinton and her husband used the Clinton Foundation to receive contributions from anyone who was willing to do so. At least seven foreign governments that received State Department clearance for purchasing American arms did donate to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary: Algeria, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, Thailand, Norway and Australia.
Clinton Foundation’s donor list highlighted the multiple layers of complexity to accumulating conflicts of interests. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton openly accused some of those countries of failing to marshal a serious and sustained campaign to confront terrorism. In a December 2009 State Department cable published by Wikileaks, Clinton complained of “an ongoing challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing emanating from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority.” Nonetheless, despite those official complains by the Secretary of State, all of these countries donated to the Clinton Foundation and received increased weapons export authorizations from the Clinton-run State Department.
According to Gregory Suchan, a 34-year State Department veteran who helped lead the agency’s oversight of arms transfers under the Bush administration, the overlap between the list of Clinton Foundation donors and those with whom they did business presents a troubling conflict of interest. For example, Hillary Clinton switched from opposing an American free trade agreement with Colombia to supporting it after a Canadian energy and mining magnate with interests in that South American country contributed to the Clinton Foundation.
Despite their progressive liberal agenda, the Clintons went to raise money in the Middle Eastern countries. Bill Clinton received $1 million for two appearances sponsored by the Abu Dhabi government, the United Arab Emirates, that were arranged while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. The United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar! They kept doing it during the period between when Hillary Clinton was at the State Department and later when she was running for President. They were also criticized for raising money from those governments, including the sheikhs in Saudi Arabia, that have very questionable human rights and certainly don’t have equal rights for women.
The Clinton Foundation officially prioritizes charitable giving and economic development and recently began an initiative to encourage philanthropy in the Mideast and Africa. In order to improve their human rights standing with the U.S. government, the Saudi royal family simply donated over $10 million from its oil fortune into the Clinton Foundation, which accepted it in part to fund programs for the monarchy’s own impoverished subjects.
The duplicity of the Clinton’s family activities involving the Clinton Foundation could not be unnoticed because they have affected us on a global scale. For example, Lakshmi Mittal, the Indian steel magnate whose global conglomerate Arcelor-Mittal produces 10 percent of world steel output, has built his industrial empire buying old plants and government sell-offs with the view that becoming large and powerful was the key to heavyweight profits. This is what economists call an oligopoly, and it does not have much to do with the major Clinton Foundation goal of expanding economic opportunity around the globe. However, a rich donation to the Clintons’ global charity by Mittal seems to have suited Hillary Clinton and her husband more than you could imagine.
There are also inevitable political complications following the Clinton’s family high-rolling operations. The more she rubbed shoulders with financial executives and philanthropic giants the more it underscored the tension arising between Hillary Clinton’s elite connections and the populist image that she has been trying to project in the heat of the current presidential campaign. Hillary Clinton has been expressing concern over growing economic inequality in the U.S. and she seems to be trying to make this issue a cornerstone of her campaign. However, political observers are increasingly asking whether the former Secretary of State’s focus on wealth inequality sits uncomfortably with the close relationships she and her husband have nurtured with some of the world’s richest individuals.
Hillary Clinton is laying ground for her future political strategy that would follow her husband’s tactic of the so-called triangulation. This strategy includes currying favor with Republican and corporate interests, while staying the course of progressive and liberal reforms. Bill Clinton is said to have been famous for doing that when he passed “welfare reform” legislation and deregulated the financial industry back in the 1990s. Those policies, according to many experts and analysts, are said to have paved the way for the current economic crisis the country is suffering now. Coupled with the corrupt practices of the Clinton Foundation, such a strategy continued by Hillary Clinton might create even bigger problems in the future.
Well then just do it
They wont do nothing the FBI found her guilty didnt do nothing let her walk free it will be the same way now its a crying shame its no wonder this Country is in the shape its in people like Hillary Clinton i dont trust the FBI they say the guy thats going to ask her Questions under Oath is a friend of Bills come on people you might as face it they are going to make sure she gets in the White House no matter what all i know this Country is really going to be in a lot of trouble might as well be prepared