Liberal news outlets have for months been saying that Donald Trump would be a disaster for the United States. They’ve basically tied his presidency to an inevitable American apocalypse, should he win the general election.
Apparently, they’ve become bored of that narrative. Maybe it wasn’t dramatic enough, or didn’t accurately capture just how deep the their disdain runs for the billionaire businessman.
The new line from The Economist is that Trump just isn’t bad for the country. According to them, his presidency represents one of the greatest risks in the world.
Yes, in the world of Putin and Kim Jong Il, Trump somehow makes the list.
See why they’ve employed this new anti-Trump narrative on the next page:
Why???
Dumb
Boy oh boy are these corrupt people trying to stop Mr Trump! Hahahaha!
His family is responsible for more deaths than$#%&!@*and Stalin combined
There are those who believe the Rothschild’s are a large part of a power group out to stop Trump.
I think the economist is an intersting center left publication. The US does not want to be like Europe and have all the problems that exist there being as poor as they are. Trump exists because Obama has run amok with no opposition and Americans don’t tolerate the lower standard of living and lack of oppertunity that Europe suffer.
Nazi propaganda.
BS. U r
well, look who it is! This liberal doesn’t like Trump because he wants open borders, refugee migration to the US, and to continue controling the people of this country!
That’s because you can’t control him. You evil corrupt man