Liberal news outlets have for months been saying that Donald Trump would be a disaster for the United States. They’ve basically tied his presidency to an inevitable American apocalypse, should he win the general election.
Apparently, they’ve become bored of that narrative. Maybe it wasn’t dramatic enough, or didn’t accurately capture just how deep the their disdain runs for the billionaire businessman.
The new line from The Economist is that Trump just isn’t bad for the country. According to them, his presidency represents one of the greatest risks in the world.
Yes, in the world of Putin and Kim Jong Il, Trump somehow makes the list.
See why they’ve employed this new anti-Trump narrative on the next page:
If the Rotschilds are against him, I’m for him.
Scared and sayin so
In case you haven’t noticed Donald Trump is an old man.
They are a scary bunch. Read the boom Planet Rothchild.
“ISIS”? You mean the army of insurgents and the “B military team” of the elites? You’re almost their…..
You people have no room to talk
OMG. So ridiculous.
yes cause trump wont allow places like korea to punch us in the balls lol or opolgize to them or let libs line their pockets with bogus big government that really dont do anything
Get their big money out of politics and things have a chance of improving.
I’d be amazed to learn that trumps few non liberals actually knew about him or who #TedCruz is.