Liberal news outlets have for months been saying that Donald Trump would be a disaster for the United States. They’ve basically tied his presidency to an inevitable American apocalypse, should he win the general election.
Apparently, they’ve become bored of that narrative. Maybe it wasn’t dramatic enough, or didn’t accurately capture just how deep the their disdain runs for the billionaire businessman.
The new line from The Economist is that Trump just isn’t bad for the country. According to them, his presidency represents one of the greatest risks in the world.
Yes, in the world of Putin and Kim Jong Il, Trump somehow makes the list.
See why they’ve employed this new anti-Trump narrative on the next page:
The rothschilds abd all the other one world order un human scum are the terrorists!!!!! Mr Trump has my Californian nationalist patriotic educated vote!!!!!
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong!
Tim Philpot don’t forget all the atrocities the dems are responsible for, too many to list. Not to mention their most likely candidate to be nominated is a criminal!Reagan was the best president this country has seen, Trump is the only candidate to do right by the people. But then we are all reminded by looking at people like yourself of the old adage : Can’t fix stupid
Might want to look up the definition of terrorism, especially before you publicly expose yourself as a complete idiot, and degrade what respect is left of your publication, if any at all.
Lemme see… And Obama, Hillary, and Bernie aren’t? How about you rant on them.
You would say that!
Good for USA
Lovin the way Trump has those corrupt SOBS shaking in their boots.
greatest threats to the elite’s business as usual
The corrupt are scared shitless of someone that can’t be bought!