Liberal news outlets have for months been saying that Donald Trump would be a disaster for the United States. They’ve basically tied his presidency to an inevitable American apocalypse, should he win the general election.
Apparently, they’ve become bored of that narrative. Maybe it wasn’t dramatic enough, or didn’t accurately capture just how deep the their disdain runs for the billionaire businessman.
The new line from The Economist is that Trump just isn’t bad for the country. According to them, his presidency represents one of the greatest risks in the world.
Yes, in the world of Putin and Kim Jong Il, Trump somehow makes the list.
See why they’ve employed this new anti-Trump narrative on the next page:
Are you scared.
Rothschild is who needs to be stopped, of course he would equate Trump to terrorism
Stick to European politics. The U.S is none of your business.
Yawn…
The NWO grip is threatened….
SUCK IT FART HEAD
Shut up and die you old fool…
The Clintons are in on this also. Not sure about Sanders though. It doesn’t matter anyhow, because Clinton will be running against a Republican for president. The plan has always been for her to be next in line, ……until Trump came along, and threw a speedbump in the plan. This is why the media, and politicians are speaking so horribly about him, and twisting the truth on what he really has said.
Or that could be there plan. Even if he isn’t with them the dude is an idiot and lies a lot. He definitely seems like the guy that would take a good bribe.
Oh yeah! Whatever.l