Liberal news outlets have for months been saying that Donald Trump would be a disaster for the United States. They’ve basically tied his presidency to an inevitable American apocalypse, should he win the general election.
Apparently, they’ve become bored of that narrative. Maybe it wasn’t dramatic enough, or didn’t accurately capture just how deep the their disdain runs for the billionaire businessman.
The new line from The Economist is that Trump just isn’t bad for the country. According to them, his presidency represents one of the greatest risks in the world.
Yes, in the world of Putin and Kim Jong Il, Trump somehow makes the list.
See why they’ve employed this new anti-Trump narrative on the next page:
Reagan also suffered multiple attacks from the Establishment! GO TRUMP!!
The castle is crumbling
funny. this world would be at peace with out the rothschilds
O yea for all of them but good for the people
Takes one to accuse one. Corrupt vast are needs to be audited.
Worse than an international murderer and pathological liar?
lol
Because its bad for his business of course.
Yea, too the elitists pocket .
Buck the system and the old rich fucks controlling our world. They gotta go.