Hillary Clinton likely never expected to have to fight so hard just to win this year’s primary. What was supposed to be a coronation of the presumptive nominee has now become a bitter battle just to hold on to the nomination that she once had in the bag.
If that weren’t enough for Clinton, it now looks as if she may need to win one more battle if she’d like to get the nomination. Word from Washington D.C. has it that the FBI is now ready to indict the former Secretary of State for her unlawful possession of classified materials.
In fact, according to former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom Delay, the FBI has accumulated so much evidence against the Democrat frontrunner, those within the organization are threatening to go public should an indictment not occur.
See what Tom Delay has to say about the indictment on the next page:
Nanette Adams maybe this will save Bernie.
Loretta Lynch needs to be indicted with her.
More talk, no action as usual!
Yes, Liberals want special treatment because in their view their principles are higher than anyone else. Truth has no bearing.
You are right. The only pressure the FBI has is to release their findings to the public and let them battle this out. However, keep in mind that the democrats have absolutely no interest in justice in this matter.
Since anyone who works for the FBI at that level has signed confidetiality agreements anyone who tries to speak out will be locked up and shut up,,,and since most Dems don’t really care about doing whats right they will just keep defending her,,,and since she is the only one who will protect hiis legacy Obama will make sure she gets the nod,
About time…
Hope this is true there is so many lies out there.
I’m fairly certain law dictates they can bypass her”rule
What are they waiting for. With the evidence already in the public domain, anyone of the rest of us would be spending a lot of our time talking to prosecutors. If Lynch oversees a miscarriage of government . . . well I will be most diappointed. What is the legal action that follows Lynch’s inaction. Constitutional Lawyers, I ask you?