There’s something about the words “Hillary Clinton” and “jail time” that’s really soothing to the ears. And the visual it brings of a corrupt old crow sitting behind bars really gives you hope for America’s future. While we’ve been hearing those words quite a bit in the media lately, the past couple of weeks have been relatively silent on the matter.
However, according to reports that came in at the end of January, it would seem that the FBI is ready to indict Hillary, and if it’s recommendation to do so isn’t followed by the United States Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, the agency’s investigators are planning on blowing the whistle and going public. Ah . . . justice.
Speaking of justice, this case could show exactly what kind of justice system we have. Will Hillary Clinton be held accountable for her actions, as she should? Or will the Obama Administration snuff this flame before it grows? This American ideal that the citizens should be held accountable while politicians get a free pass is tiresome. Who watches the watchmen?
Read what a Washington Times radio host had to say on the next page.
Either they do it or stop reporting on it. As much as I would love to see I am tired of BS reports o it!!
Stop talking about it and DO IT! Put your money where your mouth is!!
This liar thinks she is above the law. She thinks no one can touch her.
She’s not from Texas get a rope.
http://www.poetrysoup.com/me/MichaelEHarris
You might like to read Future Peasants or Political propaganda as well as Big Pharma Don’t Play Fair
Kenneth Star replacement I guess.
It worked so well for Republicans and their gullible fan base, so why not.
Anybody who thinks Obama’s incredibly partisan DOJ would indict they’re front runner for the next POTUS of their own party (per recommendation of the FBI) is smoking something extremely strong.
Please….if it isn’t going to happen just shut up about it. Sick of the headlines that mean nothing.
While agree with you about the tone of this article . I whole disagree with you on the rest . Anyone , absolutely anyone who has ever handled classified information will tell you this woman broke the law . She didnt just break one law either she broke several . Starting with the inprooer care and keeping of classified documents . Second she failed to inform her immediate superior of her failings . Third and probably the most serious in my eyes she encouraged staffers to remove or change the headers on documents so they could send them to her . This is not in debate . Her very own emails show this . Changing the header on a classified document is a serious no no . She failed to notify her immediate superiour once she learned that her private and illegal email server was breached and classified materials had been compromised . Make no mistake about if her name was Hillary Jones , armed security would have come to escourt her from the building , her office would have been sealed while the exact nature and compositiom of the breached material was determined . Then she would have been charged and convicted and right now instead of campaigning she would be stamping out license plates. Instead of showing this woman preferential treatment , the FBI abd DOJ should be making such an example of her she would serve as a cautionary tail for the next hundred years to anyone who has 6the notion and sense of entitlement to think they are above the oetty concerns of national security . Like i said anyone who has ever handled classified information will tell you i am correct . If anything they would tell you i am being kind in my assessment