If you want to push an illegal agenda and deny constitutional rights to citizens, the key is to find a corrupt federal judge who will ignore the law in order to promote a leftist agenda, whether it be anti-gun rights, gay marriage, or atheist demands that Christianity be erased from the public square. The reasoning does not have to be stellar, because it takes time and money to challenge and undue the damage caused by partisan judges, and that is why the Left is so anxious to place politically biased judges on the bench.
In a ruling last week, a Connecticut Superior Court judge has decided to use her position to deny citizens their 2nd amendment right to bear arms, but because the issue has pretty well-defined guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court, the judge has decided that it will take special, twisted logic to prevent citizens from owning weaponry.
See sneaky legal maneuvers to eliminate guns, page 2:
What has happen to this country? This is just stupid.
B******t,,lets all sue car manufacturers now for all the dui deaths,, how the hell did we let so many morons get into power positions..
Paid off by Obama and Clinton on common sense it was not the gun it was the stupid one on the trigger don’t you think. But that’s a politician for you.
God dam lebral judge
Considering its all been proven as f**e…. Several times over with same people at almost supposed “mass” shooting, or school shooting. What a bunch of morons
I guess the liberals did not pay their crisis actors enough now they want remmington arms to pay them for their time at sandy hoax!.
Time to remove judges !!! They are to enforce law not make it
this is not right blame the PERSON NOT THE TOOL
False, Sandy hook never happened, This is BS
” James Madison wrote a critique on a plan and scheme to create “a confederation of sovereigns, ” under a council of deputies, for the double purpose of arbitrating external controversies among nations, and of guarantying their respective governments against internal revolutions” He pointed out that the plan would “perpetuate arbitrary power wherever it existed”;in addition, it would extinguish “the hope of one day seeing an end of oppression [and] cut off the only source of consolation remaining to the oppressed.”