Christian Baker Forced To Make Cake For Gay Couples – Update
Baker Jack Phillips was ordered by a judge last year to make cake for gay couples, which Phillips had refused to do because of his religious beliefs. Last month he filed an appeal.
The decision by the judge was reinforced by the Civil Rights Commission of Colorado – Phillips must now submit quarterly reports for two years to show how he’s changed his “discriminatory practices.”
“Any person doing business in Colorado has to recognize that they have to do business in an ethical and law abiding way and the law says you cannot discriminate,” stated Raju Jairam, vice chairman of the commission.
And what of our First Amendment law that says Phillips has free-speech rights and free-exercise rights?
The ACLU is involved in the case against Phillips: “We at the ACLU very much support religious freedom, but religious freedom doesn’t mean that somebody who has a business has the right to discriminate against members of the public who want to patronize the business,” stated Mark Silverstein from the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado.
Where do you stand with the 1st Amendment rights of an individual as it might conflict with the discrimination of others?
Nearly two years after a same-sex couple was refused service at a Colorado cake shop, a civil rights panel on Friday deemed the act discrimination and ordered the owner to halt the practice.
The state’s seven-member Civil Rights Commission reinforced a December ruling from an administrative law judge who said Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips discriminated against Charlie Craig and David Mullins when he refused to make them a wedding cake because of religious objections.
In its decision, the panel required Phillips to submit quarterly reports for two years that show how he has worked to change discriminatory practices by altering company policies and training employees. Phillips also must disclose the names of any clients who are turned away.
“Any person doing business in Colorado has to recognize that they have to do business in an ethical and law abiding way and the law says you cannot discriminate,” said Raju Jairam, vice chairman of the commission.
Craig and Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the state’s Civil Rights Commission in July 2012 after they were turned away by the Lakewood baker while trying to buy a cake for a wedding reception.
Colorado law bans discrimination in a public place on grounds of sexual orientation, but Phillips has argued that forcing him to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples violates his right to First Amendment free-speech and freedom-of-religion rights.
Phillips and his attorney are considering an appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals. He suggested on Friday that the rights of business owners with similar views were taken away by the commission.
Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cake in Lakewood, decorates a birthday cake Thursday, January 3, 2012. (Lindsay Pierce, Denver Post file photo)
“Not all of life is fair,” Phillips said said after the commission’s decision. “I will stand by my convictions until somebody shuts me down.”
Craig and Mullins said the panel’s decision validated everything they had been feeling. The couple said they have been inundated with support from people across the country since their story became public.
“When it came time to file the lawsuit we realized that this wasn’t just about us and they weren’t just supporting us as individuals,” Mullins said. “They were supporting the idea that gays shouldn’t be discriminated against in public accommodations. We felt like the best way we could honor what they had done for us was to follow this through. It hasn’t always been the easy road, but I believe we’ve been on the right one.”
In his December ruling, administrative law judge Robert N. Spencer said offering the same services to gay couples as it would heterosexual couples did not violate the cake shop owner’s right to free speech or prevent him from exercising his religion.
The judge ordered the cake shop owner to “cease and desist” from discriminating against same-sex couples. He said the fact that Colorado does not recognize same-sex marriage does not excuse discrimination based on sexual orientation. Colorado allows civil unions.
“At first blush, it may seem reasonable that a private business should be able to refuse service to anyone it chooses,” the judge wrote. “This view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they are.”
Spencer said the cake shop owner’s argument “would allow a business that served all races to nonetheless refuse to serve an interracial couple because of the business owner’s bias against interracial marriage.”
The conservative Christian organization Alliance Defending Freedom appealed the ruling in January by arguing that the government was “attempting to force Jack to violate his sincerely held religious beliefs and to compel him to speak a message that is contrary to his actual beliefs.”
Nicolle Martin, attorney for Masterpiece Cakeshop, called the ruling disappointing.
So if a muslim was requested to make a Christian breakfast in a restaurant which included bacon and he refused to do so, could and would the state and the courts require the muslim to do so? To make a point, Christians should seek out dining establishments with muslim workers and demand pork product to be made by the muslims and when they fail to do so, sue the place. Maybe then the courts and these judges would have to reverse their rulings!
Truth And Action/Wanda: then why did King David sign a marriage contract with the previous kings son? Sounds to me like he was happily married to a guy.
And god never said homosexuality was wrong. Someone claiming to speak for god did. But if we go by that, we also have to stone people for eating shell fish… Or marrying outside of their race… Or women… For whatever reason a man wants.
And we do know what type of person the baker is. He’s the type of person to judge another human being, which is, I thought… Something Jesus called a no no.
Barry Dean: that has yet to be proven. Most science on the subject says they are born that way. Even if it is a choice, which science seems to think it’s not, who are you to judge what is moral or immoral? A human. If god thought they were so horrible, he wouldn’t allow it. But he does. But currently, the science indicates that homosexuality is something you are born to.
Chad: many Christians don’t agree with you. My wife and her family are Christians. I was raised Christian. Many people I know are Christian… Only a couple agree with you.
He is not being discriminated against. There are laws he must follow. He didn’t and now he is paying the price.
Your lord and savior wants you to mind your own business… And let people be people and your god will sort them out in the end. Now, it sounds to me like you are trying to impose your will on god, who specifically said to let him handle it… And to love your fellow man.
Everyone else: please think and of research before expressing an opinion. Not liking the law is not the same thing as there not being a law. This person is free to break the law… But must pay if he does. At the end of the day, you must have a legitimate reason for not serving someone. It cannot be based on something ridiculous like sexuality, sex, race, or having one eye.
You can refuse if the person has no shoes, an animal, or is being a jerk.
Enjoy!
That is just so wrong , if I was gay I would go to someone who wanted my money , this is just another example of us being pushed around by liberals.
I bet if a gay couple had a sign that said no guns the judge worth protect there right , just another example of double standard also
So if a muslim was requested to make a Christian breakfast in a restaurant which included bacon and he refused to do so, could and would the state and the courts require the muslim to do so? To make a point, Christians should seek out dining establishments with muslim workers and demand pork product to be made by the muslims and when they fail to do so, sue the place. Maybe then the courts and these judges would have to reverse their rulings!
Truth And Action/Wanda: then why did King David sign a marriage contract with the previous kings son? Sounds to me like he was happily married to a guy.
And god never said homosexuality was wrong. Someone claiming to speak for god did. But if we go by that, we also have to stone people for eating shell fish… Or marrying outside of their race… Or women… For whatever reason a man wants.
And we do know what type of person the baker is. He’s the type of person to judge another human being, which is, I thought… Something Jesus called a no no.
Barry Dean: that has yet to be proven. Most science on the subject says they are born that way. Even if it is a choice, which science seems to think it’s not, who are you to judge what is moral or immoral? A human. If god thought they were so horrible, he wouldn’t allow it. But he does. But currently, the science indicates that homosexuality is something you are born to.
Chad: many Christians don’t agree with you. My wife and her family are Christians. I was raised Christian. Many people I know are Christian… Only a couple agree with you.
He is not being discriminated against. There are laws he must follow. He didn’t and now he is paying the price.
Your lord and savior wants you to mind your own business… And let people be people and your god will sort them out in the end. Now, it sounds to me like you are trying to impose your will on god, who specifically said to let him handle it… And to love your fellow man.
Chris Mangino: yes. You can’t discriminate. But I doubt you’d find a Muslim place that serves bacon.
Lester Wicker: this law came into being a long time before Obama took office… Perhaps look into these things before making ridiculous assertions.
Everyone else: please think and of research before expressing an opinion. Not liking the law is not the same thing as there not being a law. This person is free to break the law… But must pay if he does. At the end of the day, you must have a legitimate reason for not serving someone. It cannot be based on something ridiculous like sexuality, sex, race, or having one eye.
You can refuse if the person has no shoes, an animal, or is being a jerk.