President Trump’s war with the mainstream media has just risen to a higher level. It’s clear that he has major issues with leftist outlets such as the New York Times and CNN. It’s even likely that he is enjoying the battle he is having with them. And much of his base of support, fed up with watching the major media fawn and genuflect before liberals such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, are enjoying the show.
The question, however, is whether there is a point beyond which President Trump should not go in his attacks on the press? Put another way, is there a difference between attacking the press as an institution and attacking a portion of the media for what you believe are deliberately biased statements and manipulation of facts?
More on page two.
no ofuckingmuslim drew that line
Take a break Wallace!!!!
Free speech goes both ways? Yes, and it is the job of the media to report the news when the official line is “AND THE PRESIDENT IS NOT TO BE QUESTIONED!” I don’t recall any history of Washington, Franklin, Paine, Madison or Jefferson kneeling down to kiss the shoes of anyone.
NO YOU HAVE TRUMP HAD A RIGHT TO SAY THE LEFT MEDIA IS THE EMENY THEY ARE
I’ve always liked Chris, But if he is jumping on the bash Trump now, I will not watch him again !!!!!!!!!!
Screw you Chris Wallace. Your dad was a sorry$#%&!@*news person too.
DROP DEAD WALLACE !!!
Too many “news reporters” have taken it upon themselves to become commentators. This is not reporting the news. This is giving an unwanted opinion that is not necessarily in line with what I believe to be factual.
The media crossed it and he’s just calling them on it. They fn lie and withhold information. They should be shut down. The are unethical.
Bull$#%&!@* line was drawn by nonacceptance and disrespect to a sitting President