“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
YES
YES right now
Before he runs back to Kenya! Take the TRASH out early. No Treasonous assholes wanted here. Take your isis butt buddies with you oDUMBo!
Could only hope!!!!
Imprison oDUMBo and his cronies!
David, let’s just go with one example. Dolores touched on it: trading 5 KNOWN terrorists for one Deserter, who was considered a POW. By US law, this was considered treason. If you would like to know the exact law, please, help yourself, and look it up. Go ahead, say I don’t have any proof. Omuslem signed the order himself for releasing these horrible people. Really don’t know how much more to make it clear. This is just one of dozens of reasons why Barry needs to go to the gallows, but I am just using this one example.
That would be awesome
Yes
In our dreams
The sergeant at arms hasnt done his job. Therefore, violating his oath to the constitution