“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
He should be held in gitmo.
He must be arrested!!! Hillary too!!!!!
Patty Miller ummmmm No? Here are screenshots that prove exactly what you posted is true? I’m agreeing with you so if I’m delusional so are you
That would be so great!
Patty Miller
Patty Miller
Y now? Y after 2 terms? Thats a problem. We should have prevented all this. Not allow him to finish the do something. Would u watch someone be raped then after their finished do something? We shouldnt see anything happening to him as a victory. We should have stopped him years ago.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/home/mcconnell-announces-new-senate-sergeant-at-arms
Apparently Wilson has been replaced. Contact the senate minority leader McConnell and the majority leader and if the new fellow won’t do it, have them appoint a new senate-sergeant-at-arms who will arrest him.
Patty Miller these ALL confirm your post of the hacks. They also state that it was done by the Russians. Why are you arguing with me? Your post was factually correct and here is my proof to support your claim!
What are you waiting for? ??????????