“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
THEY NEED TO REALLY DO IT
Look into “constitutional powers of the Joint Chiefs of Staff” – I believe in cases of treason or blatent unlawful activity – the Joint Chiefs have constitutional power to remove a president.
That’s what the American people want to know why are these crimes against America and the constitution not being upheld arrest them now
Amen Start with Obama, the Clinton’s, Soros, and the leaders of the UN.
No one in Washington has the guts to arrest Obama and he knows it!
Duuuu eeeet. Duuuuu eeeet.
He should be held accountable for all his crimes just like any other person would.
Oh that would be a shame,arrest this POS Muslim,lock that$#%&!@*up and throw the damn key away!
Lock this trash up!!
Rope