“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
I mean, yeah. So sneaky to not do that at any time during the first 7 years and 11 months of his Presidency. Or ever give any indication of being the kind of President who would do that. Also sneaky the way the economy grew and unemployment fell while he was running things. And gas got cheaper, and the stock market soared. And 15 million people got health insurance that saved many of their lives and prevented millions from going bankrupt due to medical bills. Typical dictator.
It’ll never happen
For what crime?
Okd pic
What BS?
What enemies?
Screw Russia be worried about China
Yes
Arrest him for what?
Hang him