“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
It is l
Past time.
About time.
A
We the people and America say time to do something
A
I think this is a good start..starting at the top, make an example
A
I just cannot believe that our crappy Congress is just letting him continue to lead our country down a road of destruction. He needs to be hung for treason! Just like the$#%&!@*s got at the Nuremberg trials. He won’t be by himself though… All who watched and did nothing, needs to be arrested for aiding and abetting. I detest that man.
What was the crime? The article didn’t say. Because they have no fucking clue. Like you.
Yes get him and Hillary’s criminal$#%&!@*in jail