“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Totally agree Kathy !!! He went lay low and just leave, he is actually still breaking the law and he knows it !!!!
I figure that right now if General Commander John Doe or FBI etc arrested Obama, they would be dead the next day.
He’s guilty of unprofessional conduct after the fact Loretta lynch let bill Clinton on the air plane
PLEASE ARREST THE FOREIGNER!!!!!!!!!
IF ONLY
Watch What YOU WISH===HE IS STILL the PRESIDENT
I AGREE!
Would rather see rope marks on his neck, and Hillarys too, after they are hung for Treason on the WH lawn for all the world to see and cheer.
He should be arrested he is trying to do all he can to have Russia start a war and he knows they will win because he has weakened our military, he needs to be arrested!!!
Obama’s record begins in 2010, with the economy in bad shape, but no longer in free-fall. A one-year “lag” does not fully account for longer-term effects like those from Clinton’s financial deregulation and George W. Bush’s financial stewardship leading up to the 2008 crisis, but it does capture most of the “bottoming out” (or peaking) of the previous president’s policies.