Although the November election has taken quite the toll on liberals’ minds, the effect has been especially pronounced in the ever-progressive state of California.
Known as one of the most unapologetically-progressive states in the nation, the Sunshine State has become the nexus of a litany of nutty schemes that have blossomed in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory. The most well-known of these hare-brained ideas is the push by many Californians to make their state secede from the union in a campaign called Calexit, a name that consciously recalls the decision of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union.
Although many understandably write off such plans as pitiful attempts by desperate liberals to distance themselves from the results of the election, there are actions that these malcontents could undertake that would have disastrous consequences for the rest of the country.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Individuals rights come before state rights come before federal. So no in your example that should not happen, and is really the one instance where the federal government should supercede the state (when individuals are being threatened) but the wall or lack of isn’t a direct infringement of anybodies rights…so the state should have the authority to choose.
So if California continues to allow illegal immigration to flow into the state, the Federal government has no right to put an end to it ?
I disagree
If one states actions threaten any other, those actions need to be dealt with. There are many ways this can be done
Bernie Shanders western NY is very Republican outside of the biggest cities.
My guess is Federal Emigration Law will superceded a state law.
Build the wall and put him under it
suggestion, don’t stand in front of the bulldozer. Now, isn’t that humane of me?
Executive order.$#%&!@*you.
Aren’t you something??