European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
What if the sun goes supernova and blows up the entire Solar System?
And what if it dosn’t?
What if Bill Nye had been a plummer?
So sorry. You are not a scientist, just a lackey with an engineering degree.
What if it doesn’t?
Stupid question. What if the sky fell?
What an idiot.. it may happen in 500 million years
If all the ice could melt rapidly, there would be pink skies and rainbow and no laws of physics. As the ice melts, humans, that would be us, would adapt. We have adapted for 10’s of 1000’s of years and that will continue. Those who can’t will perish. Thank you, Darwin. The Dutch have been adapting to an encroaching sea for 2000 years. New Orleans has been adapting since it’s founding. Floods happen, we will survive. Does everyone have to pretend that climate changes are not natural and that humans require a constant environment to survive? Sheesh! If primitive man were as apparently helpless as today’s man, we would have become extinct millennia ago.
What if we paid Trillions of dollars only to find out the rest of the world refused to do their part to stem this? What if they only agreed to it for our money and it still happened. What if all your climate predictions failed to materialize? Oh wait, none of them have come true. What if you are a fool and those that believed you found out they lost everything for nothing? STFU, more and more are seeing the hypocrisy of your fallacy with those supporting your faulty science flying private jets everywhere to tell us how much we pollute.
He would still be an idiot?