European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
It will take nearly 5000 years for all the ice to melt.
What if we have another ice age?
We would have more land
What if the sky falls?
What if all the money in the world was in my bank account?
What if the sun never comes up.what if the earh goes out out of orbit? What if the burn rFe of the sun increases by 30%? What if based on radiation lizards become dinosaurs again?
Mother nature would bed at fault not trump
what if every American won the lottery dip stick just as likely
Then we would have nothing to worrie about any more u stupid bastard!!!!!
i was about to post one of those but hey i still can kinda funny