European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
Using Their Words Against Them |
Awan Brothers Visas Raise Questions In Wake of Murder of Beranton J. Whisenant Jr.
1,670
Shares
Published May 31, 2017 by Zach Haller
In the early hours of the morning Wednesday, May 24, 2017, federal prosecutor Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. was found dead on a beach in Miami, Florida, having been murdered in cold blood. According to the Miami Herald, the 37-year-old had just joined the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office in January, and was assigned to investigate cases of visa and passport fraud.
As Whisenant’s loved ones grieve the loss of an outstanding and promising public servant, a criminal investigation has been initiated to investigate his murder by the Hollywood Police Department. Whisenant’s body was recovered within the parameters of Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s district, the disgraced former Democratic National Committee Chairperson who has been the subject of intense public scrutiny for numerous ongoing scandals since her resignation as Chairperson from the DNC last summer.
In addition to the massive class action lawsuit filed against the Florida lawmaker and the DNC seeking damages for Party donors and voters duped by the Party’s fraudulent primary, the DNC faces another lawsuit that exposes the grotesque compensation inequality that was occurring internally within a DNC that gave exorbitant million-dollar bonuses to senior leadership while failing to pay field organizers fairly.
Wasserman Schultz is also implicated in two complex and ongoing criminal scandals. First, recent events have renewed uncertainty around the homicide of Seth Rich, the slain DNC voter-expansion data director and likely leak whose death preceded the release of tens of thousands of incriminating documents that led to Wasserman Schutlz’s resignation as Party Chair. After Fox News announced there is evidence that would connect information on Rich’s laptop to Wikileaks email releases, they issued an ambiguous retraction that did not appear to deny the existence of this evidence, despite retracting the description of what or where this evidence may be held. Since then, internet legend Kim Dotcom has formally volunteered testimony as evidence to confirm Rich did provide these documents to Wikileaks to the Party and Wasserman Schultz’s chagrin.
Secondly, a highly incriminating investigation remains ongoing regarding Wasserman Schultz’s former staffer, Irman Awan, who recently fled the country after a massive security breach in which numerous government devices and the infinite data and documents accessible there were stolen from representatives and high-ranking Democrats. The Daily Caller reports dozens of House Democrats, including many of whom serve on the intelligence, homeland security and foreign affairs committees, employed Awan or a relative working alongside him, despite rarely or never seeing the employees. These rogue employees and current suspects had full access to confidential emails, data, and documents of the members for whom they worked; the focus of this investigation by U.S. Capitol Police revolves around an off-site server on which congressional data was allegedly loaded without the knowledge of authorities.
Should the death of Whisenant, in the impending criminal investigation initiated by local law enforcement, be determined to be retaliatory and linked to Wasserman Schultz, this would have nuclear implications on her culpability in the other lawsuits and investigations surrounding events that have occurred under her purview as DNC chair, senior leadership at the Clinton campaign, and representing Florida’s 23rd district in Congress.
Debbie and The Democrats’ Ongoing Death Spiral
As if the disastrous Citizens United court ruling wasn’t enough to expose a “trust gap” that would be the beginning of the end for the Democratic Party as we know it, Former President Barack Obama would go on to beat the dying horse by seating former Clinton campaign manager Wasserman Schultz as Chair of the DNC in 2011. She would serve until 2016, when she stepped down following the release of the Wikileaks emails potentially transmitted by Rich before his passing. The content of these emails corroborated evidence of the collusion that took place between the Party, the Clinton campaign, pro-Clinton super PACs, establishment media, and other entities to favor a Clinton coronation.
Whisenant’s murder took place one month following a Federal court hearing of oral arguments presented by the Democrats in support of the Motion to Dismiss a class-action lawsuit filed against the Party and Wasserman Schultz originally filed on June 28, 2016. The hearings revealed the Democrats consider themselves too big to jail: despite the guarantee of impartiality assured in the organization’s Charter, the DNC asserted in Court they are bound by no legal obligation to actually run the primary impartially, so they could have favored a candidate (but they didn’t). This slimy and roundly indefensible posturing is consistent with Wasserman Schultz’s public messaging on the subject:
You gin and tonic would be warm, Bill.
Your not a scientist, you are just a person that just grabs on to the first thing that comes along, just like Gore
What if all the water in the world froze?
eat$#%&!@*nye get thee to the nunnery with your$#%&!@*friends
What if the ice grew took all the water?
Bill Nye is a fraud.
What if aliens ate a man’s brain and implanted the idea that he is a science guy who belongs on TV?
What if Bill Nye had a brain
I doubt that when its was snowing in Russia