Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who first raised eyebrows with the now infamous comment that vaccines are a good method of reducing the global population, has been predicting for years that there is a great and significant chance the world will see a global pandemic that will kill tens of millions people.
“First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3,” Gates said in a 2010 Ted Talk.
While that is quite disconcerting on its face, ‘conspiracy theorists’ are told it’s taken out of context and that the intention is to reduce population by reducing child mortality. Simply put, parents in Third World countries wouldn’t feel the need to have so many kids if they felt that disease wouldn’t strike so many down.
Feel better?
How ironic is it that one of the world’s richest men, who’s spent millions advocating a ‘pro-vaccine’ outlook, also holds firm in the belief of a ravaging disease enveloping and drastically reducing the number of human beings on the planet.
Gates has spent a lot of money on predictive models that show this pandemic will come on quick – from China – and kill off millions in just a few months.
He’s quoted as downplaying the prospect of nuclear war as ‘fairly low’ and that our current environment has incredible potential to spread disease lightning quick.
When is this predicted to happen? Rather sooner than later…
GO TO PAGE 2:
There’s this thing about science called the scientific methodology. Let me explain it to the uninitiated, please? Somebody sees something or hears about something and based on what they have been taught and know, they have an idea about it. Then they do some investigating further and research it with data from reliable sources and if the investigation and research confirms their idea, then they write a paper on what is then called a theory. THEN, an independent study by peer groups looks at the theory and verifies the data is reliable and complete and uses that data to confirm the theory by coming to the same conclusion. This is called a proof of theory. Then, more observation takes place applying the theory to what actually happens and if the Theory actually predicts an actual future event or events then it is reviewed again and if the data checks out and the accuracy of the theory checks out, then a paper is published and receives peer approval and acknowledgement and then the theory is judged to be proven and be fact and people refer to such proven theories as natural laws. Ohm’s Law, the law of Gravity, the law of Thermodynamics, etc.
The theory of man caused climate change, was first called the theory of man caused global cooling, and then the theory of man caused global warming, and now it’s called the theory of man caused climate change. It is called the theory of man caused global climate change now because then that covers whether it get cooler or hotter, without having to reinvest in redoing the title page on the theory paperwork if, as has continually occurred, the predictions of the idea of the ‘theory’, which more accurately could be called rhetoric, don’t match the predictions based on the data.
Which, they don’t and won’t because the original data used to substantiate the theory was cherry picked by foundations with hundreds of millions of dollars of Grant money at stake who had to: provide proof of theory or end the continued research when the funding stopped because they could not provide the requested and required proof of theory.
Now, just so we’re on the same page, the recent climate record, upon which the scientists need to depend for data has two standard problems. The longest dependable sample is 11000 years, or the period since the end of the last ice age. The longest recorded data set, on a 100% global surface temperature basis, is never. Right there we have two huge problems with veracity. Why? Because even if you get everybody to agree that approximations are acceptable long term data, and extrapolation of existing data can say for instance, the temperature of Hawaii today was a high of 68 degrees and a low of 62 degrees, you’re ignoring that there is an active volcano in the state and temperatures around the volcano can be, hot enough to melt a bulldozer. The other problem and by far the biggest problem with the data is simply, even an 11k year sample is ridiculously and infinitesimally small. If we agree that intelligent life has existed, predator and prey, for 2 Billion years, an 11k sample of the history of the planet would be: 1 segment at the end of a long chain of 181,818 segments. Not 1 in a hundred or a thousand. 1 in 181,818. And that’s only looking back 2 Billion years. The planet Earth is at least 4 BILLION years old, so an argument could be added that we could be looking at 1 segment out of 363,636 segments. But, let’s be friendly and stick to the 2 Billion number. Now, I know, somebody is going to want to same, within a margin of error, those segments are identical, so, well within scientific acceptance.
Really?
Really??
Because it occurs to me that 6090 segments ago (67 million years) when the continents were all combined forming one giant landmass and for the 14545 segments (160 million years) prior when the dinosaurs ruled the planet, that the climate was probably vastly different. And then that meteor hit central America and caused an unexpected 10 or 100 or 1000 year winter mini ice age, that the climate was unexpectedly abnormal.
The truth is that with a data set of 1 in 181,818 segments isn’t big enough for us to really have any clue what is actually “NORMAL” on planet Earth. And expecting a scientist to say that in a grant report is like expecting Lucy won’t pull away the football, when Charlie Brown tries to kick it, again.
Gates is all for New World Order and agenda 21
The Lord said…”Be fruitful and multiply.” Who’s right?? Gates or God?
Bill Gates proof you don’t have to have an ounce of intelligence to be rich, just be lucky and it the right place at the right time.
Death, brought to you by Mixrosoft…..
Windows controls most everything. Lol
https://youtu.be/ZNyo0Gu7064
Most of the people that die will be in coastal areas,New York city,Los Angeles . Karma ?
he wants to” thin the heard” that is what makes him so dangerous
Let’s hope they’re all Islamic Jihadists.