While some politicians and scientists embrace global warming and climate change with almost religious fervor, new evidence has surfaced to suggest the science is not in fact settled.
Researchers off the coast of Norway’s Svalbard archipelago have discovered that where methane gas bubbles up from seafloor seeps, surface waters above the seeps absorb twice as much carbon dioxide as surrounding waters, thus lessening the impact of climate change.
The previous assumption had been that methane seeps would inevitably increase the amount of greenhouse gases. Seeps occur above fissures on the seafloor caused of the earth’s tectonic activity.
Biogeochemist John Pohlman of the U.S. Geological Survey in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, began the research near Svalbard to learn just how much methane the Arctic Ocean was contributing to the global balance in the atmosphere.
Find out just how surprising the findings were not only to the Pohlman team but other scientists looking at the same issue regarding methane. It’s all found on the next page.
It’s not NICE to fool(try to) Mother Nature…
Soooo. Its the liberals causing the methane with all their b******t
Liberals: “We believe in science.”
Yet choose to completely ignore science when it comes to biological determination of gender and when life begins.
Co2 gas is dangerous,really,isn’t that what plants breathe and in turn release o2 into the air.
Eric L Runion,healthcare is not a right,it was a scam by Obama to get control over the 8th largest business in America and try to assure decades of democrat votes. Before the ACA, it was claimed 50 million ppl did not have healthcare,well,deduct 20 million from that number for illegals, now you have 30 million uninsured,now,deduct from that number about 13 million that either felt healthcare was not important or chose to spend money on other items like big wheels for their cars,now,you hasve 17 million with no insurance, less than 5% of the population,yet the entire population has to suffer? Why not let the states create a state funded healthcare program and rates could be charged on a sliding scale basis based on income? I’ll tell you why,because the federal govt doesn’t get the return
Eric L Runion,do not praise FDR,he was a scumbag. The same thing you would ridicule Trump for( calling Muslims terrorists) or wanting to vet Muslims better before letting them in america,he’s a racist(Muslim isn’t a race) but FDR put japs,Germans and Italians in camps during ww2 for what,America’s saftey
Eric L Runion,you are aware the interstate system was put in place under Eisenhower.the 40 hr work week,8 hr work day and paid vacation were all in part to Henry Ford. Civil rights weree first introduced in 1959 under Eisenhower but stalled by democrats until JFK was elected,women were given the right to voted by republicans,democrats started jim crow and segregation, democrats opposed ending slavery. National parks were introduced by teddy Roosevelt who was a member off the bull moose party
I just love it.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/when_erasing_symbols_of_slavery_dont_forget_the_democratic_party.html
The democrat party in a nutshell
During the first half of the 1800’s, slavery was a contentious and persistent issue. Many slave owners and Democrats viewed slavery as a necessary evil, and abolition as unnecessary contention. Thomas Jefferson advocated for mass emancipation and deportation, for he viewed the black race as too childish, and based on the 1791 Haiti rebellion, unable to handle the anger engendered by their enslavement. Another common view held that the black race was simply unable to care for itself, and thus slaves were better off under the care of their masters, and that slavery only needed greater compassion, a view still held by the Democratic Party to this day. Why do you think Democrats promote government assistance programs for African Americans? If Democrat-advocated programs are taking care of blacks, then who is the master?
Even if they publicly stated that slavery was wrong, Democrats consistently worked against abolition and emancipation, often by compromising: abolitionists get a free state, slavers get a slave state. In this way, Democrats could publicly side against slavery, while obtaining the support of wealthy slave owners. Does this tactic seem familiar, on other issues? No slaver ever supported a Republican; they meant what they said and did what they meant, and it started a war.
But that was yesterday’s Democratic Party! Guess again. After the Civil War, Democrats implemented new strategies to re-enslave or oppress African Americans. They introduced things like Jim Crow laws. President Woodrow Wilson (D) segregated the Army and Federal government. They were integrated by Republicans before him, and again by Republicans after Roosevelt. President Roosevelt appointed a leader of the Ku Klux Klan to the Supreme Court, and another KKK leader, Robert Byrd, was a prominent Democratic Senator for decades. Republicans had tried to pass the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts since the mid-50’s, but Democrats blocked them, until President Johnson (D) gutted the Acts and passed them as part of a scheme to pacify blacks and snare their votes.
Presidents Roosevelt and Johnson passed public assistance, known as the War on Poverty, and heavily promoted it among African American neighborhoods. For many African American communities, it might be better termed the War on Prosperity. When real African American leaders like Bobby Gore rose up to free blacks from their new masters, Democrats like Mayor Richard J. Daley were more than happy to pound them back down. The Democratic Party has employed a new generation of house slaves, called community organizers, to convince African Americans that all of their woes are due to their skin, and to train blacks to beg for government to take care of them, unaware of their new master.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/when_erasing_symbols_of_slavery_dont_forget_the_democratic_party.html#ixzz4mFIbXmVw
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook