Gun control advocates have found a backdoor way to advance their cause without having an honest debate on the issue.
An Oregon lawmaker has shepherded a bill through the House and Senate that mirrors similar measures in other states by trying to wrap it in the guise of protecting individuals from what they consider “extreme risk.”
Already approved by the Senate, it passed the House by a 31-28 vote and now goes to Governor Kate Brown for signature.
Gun rights advocates see the Oregon measure as just another subterfuge to get around the Second Amendment right to carry arms. The Oregon bill was patterned after a California law that was enacted in 2014.
The bill’s co-sponsor, Republican Senator Brian Boquist of Dallas, Oregon, denies the law is designed to confiscate weapons. But the design of the legislation clearly circumvents an individual’s right to due process before having to turn over the firearm.
Find out just how the new law works and the devious manner in which is being portrayed to the public. The story unfolds on the next page.
Unconstitutional = fail
Everyone with a gun show up on their doorsteps and as soon as they open the door, shoot them
Ha ha ha, then this idiot will be begging for someone with a gun to help them, not!
Fucking dumb
Debra Spangler Thompson Debra really believes everything she reads on facebook when 85 % is F**E !! LOL Trust me, I can take care of my family !!
Think about Chicago and tell me what happened to the guys in your state
The Constitution is clear. No citizen shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Due process is well defined and understood. It requires probable cause that a crime has been committed, a warrant issued on that evidence, and to be judged before a jury of your peers, including the right to cross-examine witnesses.
They can’t take your property because a government employee, ex wife, girlfriend or sworn enemy thinks you may commit a crime in the future.
I guarantee you if I live their they would have to shoot me to get mine.
Unconstitutional.
i agree