“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Now!
It is unlikely he will be impeached or removed. The rule of law has completely collapsed in Washington, at this point it should be obvious… He has committed hundreds of impeachable offenses, and nothing has been done about it…
I got an idea why don’t one of you get up and do something about it, instead of ranting and raving on fb
What “rules” has he broken?
Impeach now to save our country from further destruction!
Well we have a right to bear arms to protect ourselves from tyranny so if nobody figures this out maybe its time for revolution
And it is my personal opinion that he has used the NSA to dig up dirt on his opposition, effectively silencing them….
Ruth Crum is your husband also your father??? You’ve gotta be inbreed!!!
The Sergent at Arms Best Do His Job, or be charge for not doing is dutes
IS ANYONE DOING ANY THING ABOUT THIS. PUT HIM IN GITMO WITH HIS FRIENDS