“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Finish him!
I wish…
So arrest him
we needed to do this 8years. ago .but it Will not happen we the people deserves the government we get for our vote s &stand true to the republic &Constitutions .most people like him and the progresses $#%&!@* freebees they will not work for a good constitutions government administration .
Stop talking about it, and lets see some real action for a change.
sergeant at arms should be removed and charged with dereliction of duty
Round and round it goes, nowhere. And Obama still has his pen and phone. How pathetic we’ve become…
Can you not see that all the people at the top are scared to death(of death)…..The worlds Billionairs have bought and are buying our elected officials…And the ones that cant be bought,they are threatening their familes……Bible PROPHECY is being fulfilled as we sleep…..
well said Steve Maselbas
We need to start dumping people and get a real government. We haven’t had one in a damn long time.